June 19, 2020

Tell it Like it is: When Politically Incorrect Language Promotes Authenticity [PDF]→

June 19, 2020/ Juliana Schroeder

Rosenblum, M., Schroeder, J., & Gino, F. (2020). Tell is like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 75-103. [APA PsycNet Link]

Short Summary: This paper tests how political language influences impressions of a communicator. Using more politically incorrect (vs. correct) language made a communicator appear more authentic but less warm, and these impressions were moderated by both the political ideology of the perceiver and of the target group to whom the language was applied. (9 experiments).
Correction
Outstanding Research Award, Society for Personality and Social Psychology
Data, Materials, Preregistrations, and Audit
See related media →

September 03, 2019

Power and Decision Making: New Directions for Research in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [PDF]→

September 03, 2019/ Jennifer Paul

Fast, N., & Schroeder, J. (2020). Power and decision making: new directions for research in the age of artificial intelligence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 172-176. [Science Direct Link]

Short Summary: New advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are creating the potential to experience power in human–AI interactions. This paper reviews findings on power and decision making in the context of human–human interactions and then considers how they may be meaningfully extended through interactions with artificially intelligent digital assistants.

July 12, 2019

Two Social Lives: How Differences Between Online and Offline Interaction Influence Social Outcomes [PDF]→

July 12, 2019/ Juliana Schroeder

Lieberman, A., & Schroeder, J. (2019). Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 16-21. [Science Direct Link]

Short Summary: Today, people communicate more online than offline. What does this shift mean for human social life? This paper provides a framework for studying the influence of technology on social life.
See related media →

February 04, 2019

The Preference for Distributed Helping [PDF]→

February 04, 2019/ ScienceSites

Sharps, D., & Schroeder, J. (2019). The preference for distributed helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 954-977. [APA PsycNet Link]

Short Summary: This paper investigates the psychology underlying how people decide to allocate help (e.g., donations) among multiple needy requesters, and documents a preference for distribution (allocating help to multiple requesters) compared to concentration (allocating help to a single requester) (9 experiments).
Data and Materials, Pre-registration (Exp. 2), Pre-registration (Exp. 3), Pre-registration (Exp. 4), Pre-registration (Exp. 5a), Pre-registration (Exp. 5b)
See related media →
See Dr. Juliana Schroeder talk about this Distributed Helping paper here →

Juliana Schroeder

Juliana Schroeder

Publications

Juliana Schroeder

Publications

Tell it Like it is: When Politically Incorrect Language Promotes Authenticity [PDF]→

Power and Decision Making: New Directions for Research in the Age of Artificial Intelligence [PDF]→

Two Social Lives: How Differences Between Online and Offline Interaction Influence Social Outcomes [PDF]→

The Preference for Distributed Helping [PDF]→